🔗 Share this article

The federal appeals court has upheld a prohibition on sending state troops in the Oregon city, after a latest court ruling.

Appeals Court Concurs to Rehear Case

The ninth circuit court of appeals ruled on this week that it would rehear the legal dispute concerning the president’s authority with an larger group of 11 judges. The judicial body also vacated a earlier decision from a three-judge panel that had supported the federal government.

Ongoing Dispute Over Troop Deployment

This order represents the latest development in a long-running court case over whether the former president has the authority and valid reason to send state military units in Portland. Approximately two hundred troops have been in limbo since late September when the deployment effort was started in due to ongoing demonstrations.

Differing Viewpoints

The administration has claimed that government employees at the ICE facility in the southern part of the city were under attack, while local authorities assert that municipal police have control of the circumstances.

Contrary to characterizations of the city as “war ravaged”, residents have been sharing footage of lush hiking trails and a thriving food scene, and planning events such as an Emergency Naked Bike Ride against the increased military presence.

Court Proceedings

The Tuesday ruling came after a US district judge in Portland issued two temporary restraining orders this month – one preventing the federalization of the Oregon national guard, and another stopping the deployment of any military personnel in Oregon, after attempts to circumvent the first order by calling up out-of-state forces.

On the previous day, the appeals court had temporarily suspended the initial decision – allowing control of 200 Oregon national guard – but the second ruling stayed effective, blocking the physical sending of the forces.

Full Panel Consideration

The Tuesday decision means the issue will be heard “en banc” – with both rulings under consideration simultaneously – by a group of eleven justices.

“This ruling demonstrates that facts are important and that the judicial system are striving to hold this administration accountable. The constitution limits the president’s power, and Oregon’s communities cannot be treated as a training ground for expansive government power,” stated the legal representative in a statement.

“The court is sending a clear message: the executive leader cannot dispatch the military into US cities without cause. We will continue defending state legislation, values, and sovereignty as this case moves forward and our legal battle continues in the courts.”